Samsung expert witnesses: Sorry, Apple, there's no infringement - CNET
The utter idiocy of paying for something which does not protect you in the least and which leaves you having to seek expert witnesses and paying lawyers through your nose to defend your patent is, quite frankly, patently absurd.
Samsung expert witnesses: Sorry, Apple, there's no infringement - CNET
The obvious solution is to pay a small fee to have the government verify that you thought of an idea on such and such a date. Then, you would do what you have to do now. You fight patent infringement in court if you think someone is using your patent without paying you.
What idiot would want to pay thousands for NOTHING! Let's do away with the patent office as it now exists! I'm so frustrated over this that all I can do is state it again, you have to defend your patent on your own. What the heck does a court care whether some patent examiner granted the patent if it has the power to invalidate it?
Oh, so asinine. So, so, asinine!
Samsung expert witnesses: Sorry, Apple, there's no infringement - CNET
The obvious solution is to pay a small fee to have the government verify that you thought of an idea on such and such a date. Then, you would do what you have to do now. You fight patent infringement in court if you think someone is using your patent without paying you.
What idiot would want to pay thousands for NOTHING! Let's do away with the patent office as it now exists! I'm so frustrated over this that all I can do is state it again, you have to defend your patent on your own. What the heck does a court care whether some patent examiner granted the patent if it has the power to invalidate it?
Oh, so asinine. So, so, asinine!
Comments
Post a Comment