TheWorx

We know the gaslighter who, thankfully, only affects the MAGA base. The MAGA are just as smart as anyone else so one has to say that they willingly allow themselves to be gaslighted. There's nothing that can be done. The person afflicted with Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy is none other than our esteemed Dr. Anthony Fauci. I remember reacting incredulously when the news reported that Tony was receiving death threats. I couldn't make heads or tails out of it until my Son and I started discussing the provenance of the Novel Coronavirus. The origin fell at the good doctor's doorstep. https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741 When you have the gaslighter confusing the heck out of everything and when you add Mr. Bannon to the mix, you soon realize that the "gain-of-function" work promoted by Dr. Fauci was his way of becoming a hero to the U.S.--if not the world--by unleashing a monster wh...

I received the above text in an email newsletter talking about, what else? It was sent by the LA Times. The problem I have with this text is that it implies that coronaviruses need  saliva to infect or remain infective. If that is the case, I have to disagree with the premise. If this were the case, you would stop the spread in days by having a dehumidifier going day and night--but wait, the air is dry in the winter and yet the spread is greatest at that time. Oh, they might tell you, covid spreads in Winter because people congregate indoors. Sounds plausible but why don't they then recommend dehumidification of indoor air? I hope they don't because humidity decreases air density permitting the then heavier-than-air objects like viruses to sink to a lower level away from your face. That brings up an interesting observation, though. If I am right about the importance of air density in the spread of covid, it would contribute to an explanation for the high mortality in nursin...

[My comments in red] This is my commentary on an editorial which appeared in the LA Times recently wherein Senator Sanders fills in and allows the editorial board to take a break from playing their own Clinton tunes. The conventions are over and the general election has officially begun. In the primaries, I received 1,846 pledged delegates, 46% of the total. Hillary Clinton received 2,205 pledged delegates, 54%. She received 602 superdelegates. I received 48 superdelegates. Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee and I will vigorously support her. Ipso facto, Mr. Sanders also supports a corrupt nominating process. Donald Trump would be a disaster and an embarrassment for our country if he were elected president. The "disaster" and "embarrassment" would be the failure of the Government's balance of power--I say let's test it. His campaign is not based on anything of substance — improving the economy, our education system, healthcare or the envi...

[as is my custom, I've entered my comments immediately following the pertinent section in italics and in blue] A year ago,  Hillary Clinton  seemed to be on her way to a serene, obstacle-free coronation as the 2016 Democratic nominee for president. In an April 14, 2015, editorial, The Times bemoaned the fact that the Democratic race consisted of “exactly one candidate with a truly national profile” — the former secretary of state and U.S. senator from New York. The editorial did mention Sen.  Bernie Sanders , but only as one of a group of second-tier figures that also included former Rhode Island Gov.  Lincoln Chafee  and former U.S. Sen  Jim Webb  of Virginia (remember them?). National profile? Do you mean like that of Barack Hussein Obama, and are you saying that he has fallen flat on his face on account of his lack of national profile?" You fucking bastards. Today, as California prepares for its primary on June 7,  Clinton  is again ...