Paul Ryan or Saul Ryan?
I Tweeted to the Pope a while ago that Mr. Paul Ryan should be excommunicated. Perhaps the Pope realized the seriousness of the agenda of this ersatz Catholic and decided to write him a letter. In any event, fast forward to today and we hear on CNN that Mr. Ryan had fired the Congressional Chaplain, a Jesuit just like the Pope. The pretext was that the Chaplain had lobbied for the poor in one of his sermons. That cooked his goose for nothing irks the average Republican member of congress more than to have to consider the needs of the poor or of the minorities.
But lets consider Mr Ryan's admonition to the Chaplain to stay out of politics and stop advocating for the poor. This shows us that Mr. Ryan is devoid of compassion and severely lacking in knowledge of Constitutional law. The former deficit demands excommunication, the latter demands that Mr. Ryan refrain from ever again representing any U.S. citizen.
The basis for his action against the Catholic Chaplain is, of course, the First Amendment to our Constitution which begins:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .
This miserable dirtball of a human--and we have to call him human because he is capable of shooting a bow and arrow (never mind that his target is a defenseless sentient being)--purports to know the law but in reality all he knows is Republican greed. The Chaplain was just saying, "remember the poor" when you propose the budget, and that dictum, although clearly part of Catholic thought, is also canonical in every other major religion with the possible exception of satanism. Is Mr. Ryan defending satanism? If so, it is more evidence for his excommunication. True concern for the poor is also found abundantly in various secular beliefs other than libertarianism; but you need not even bring up the First Amendment because no one was promoting one religion over another and no one was even trying to prohibit Mr. Ryan from practicing his brand of religion which is, ipso facto, anything but Catholicism.
The flip side is this: Mr. Ryan who does not practice true Catholocism has, in fact, gone on to violate the First Amendment by "prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ." When a chaplain is hired for the hypocrites at our nation's secular 'temple,' he must have some credentials in devinity or theology but, more than that, the chaplain should have real world experience. To demand that that man change his religion IN ANY WAY, is to trample on our Constitution. That shouldn't come as a surprise but to let the bulbous-eyed archer get away with being a despot--especially on his way out the revolving door--is wrong!
My demand for a writ of excommunication will probably go unanswered by the Vatican but Pope Francis will have to answer to our Lord and Savior for why he has allowed Mr. Ryan to victimize our faith by promoting greed and the censure of the widow's mite and to do so on the most blatant disingenuous and specious grounds.
Lots of luck to you, Mr. Ryan. I hope you find threading a camel through the eye of a needle adequately fulfilling as you near your end times.
But lets consider Mr Ryan's admonition to the Chaplain to stay out of politics and stop advocating for the poor. This shows us that Mr. Ryan is devoid of compassion and severely lacking in knowledge of Constitutional law. The former deficit demands excommunication, the latter demands that Mr. Ryan refrain from ever again representing any U.S. citizen.
The basis for his action against the Catholic Chaplain is, of course, the First Amendment to our Constitution which begins:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .
This miserable dirtball of a human--and we have to call him human because he is capable of shooting a bow and arrow (never mind that his target is a defenseless sentient being)--purports to know the law but in reality all he knows is Republican greed. The Chaplain was just saying, "remember the poor" when you propose the budget, and that dictum, although clearly part of Catholic thought, is also canonical in every other major religion with the possible exception of satanism. Is Mr. Ryan defending satanism? If so, it is more evidence for his excommunication. True concern for the poor is also found abundantly in various secular beliefs other than libertarianism; but you need not even bring up the First Amendment because no one was promoting one religion over another and no one was even trying to prohibit Mr. Ryan from practicing his brand of religion which is, ipso facto, anything but Catholicism.
The flip side is this: Mr. Ryan who does not practice true Catholocism has, in fact, gone on to violate the First Amendment by "prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ." When a chaplain is hired for the hypocrites at our nation's secular 'temple,' he must have some credentials in devinity or theology but, more than that, the chaplain should have real world experience. To demand that that man change his religion IN ANY WAY, is to trample on our Constitution. That shouldn't come as a surprise but to let the bulbous-eyed archer get away with being a despot--especially on his way out the revolving door--is wrong!
My demand for a writ of excommunication will probably go unanswered by the Vatican but Pope Francis will have to answer to our Lord and Savior for why he has allowed Mr. Ryan to victimize our faith by promoting greed and the censure of the widow's mite and to do so on the most blatant disingenuous and specious grounds.
Lots of luck to you, Mr. Ryan. I hope you find threading a camel through the eye of a needle adequately fulfilling as you near your end times.
Comments
Post a Comment