Ebay & Fraud & The Bottom Line.
Ebay tolerates fraud in its venue. On three separate occasions when bidding for an item on Ebay, a bidder with no transactions to his credit, outbids me. The next day, the item is up for sale again with the seller saying something about the non-paying bidder.
This is done in order to determine what the maximum price was that bidders were willing to pay. Let me explain. Let's say I stipulate a maximum bid of $150. However, the bidding in the last minutes of the auction only goes up to $80. The seller, would like to sell for the highest price he can get but he doesn't know my maximum amount--what is he to do? All he has to do is set up a bogus account and bid an outrageous amount. Let's say he bids $500. When he does that he wins the auction but most importantly, he now knows exactly how much I was willing to pay for the item because the winning bid will be slightly more than my maximum. The seller's bogus account holder (himself or a friend) now defaults on payment and the seller is now ready to relist the item offering it as a "buy it now" or engaging in another bogus bidding but, this time, bidding just under the maximum that I previously set and which he, by virtue of Ebay's complicity, is now privy to.
Yes, Ebay is complicit in this because there are any number of safeguards against this that the company could implement if its CEO was not like all the other unscrupulous CEO's that are slaves to Wall St. It allows this fraud, of course, because the higher an item sells, the more Ebay gets.
Simple measures could be implemented to avoid this fraud. For example, a bidder with zero transactions to his name could be prevented from bidding on an item in the last few minutes of an auction unless he puts his money in escrow. Too much trouble? There are other ways but I'll not invest any more of my time knowing that Ebay's CEO is more interested in his company's bottom line than he is in maintaining a truly legitimate venue.
This is done in order to determine what the maximum price was that bidders were willing to pay. Let me explain. Let's say I stipulate a maximum bid of $150. However, the bidding in the last minutes of the auction only goes up to $80. The seller, would like to sell for the highest price he can get but he doesn't know my maximum amount--what is he to do? All he has to do is set up a bogus account and bid an outrageous amount. Let's say he bids $500. When he does that he wins the auction but most importantly, he now knows exactly how much I was willing to pay for the item because the winning bid will be slightly more than my maximum. The seller's bogus account holder (himself or a friend) now defaults on payment and the seller is now ready to relist the item offering it as a "buy it now" or engaging in another bogus bidding but, this time, bidding just under the maximum that I previously set and which he, by virtue of Ebay's complicity, is now privy to.
Yes, Ebay is complicit in this because there are any number of safeguards against this that the company could implement if its CEO was not like all the other unscrupulous CEO's that are slaves to Wall St. It allows this fraud, of course, because the higher an item sells, the more Ebay gets.
Simple measures could be implemented to avoid this fraud. For example, a bidder with zero transactions to his name could be prevented from bidding on an item in the last few minutes of an auction unless he puts his money in escrow. Too much trouble? There are other ways but I'll not invest any more of my time knowing that Ebay's CEO is more interested in his company's bottom line than he is in maintaining a truly legitimate venue.
Comments
Post a Comment